![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
|
Drunk Driver Hit us
by Urias Jr
My wife, my sister and her daughter and I, were involved in b>Answer: Hello there. We are sorry to learn the difficult time you are having with the insurance company. This is one of the reasons why we have decided to write this website. Insurance companies in general bully people around and get away with all of these in part because consumers let them. It is a good idea to learn your rights and fight back. There are several issue that we believe are at stake in you claim. First is the issue of liability or fault. The “normal” process is that when there is a dispute on the facts, then the adjusters must look at the independent evidence (the police report), unless they have strong evidence against it (sometimes police reports have mistakes). This is not a set rule, but it is again the normal process. What we believe is happening in you case is that the insurance company believes that you, the middle car had already hit the car in front of you, then the Drunk driver hit you from behind. That is the only way you can come up with a 50% fault split in these set of facts. There are two very important pieces of evidence to determine this (aside from what you said and what the Drunk Driver said). 1- The police report which can be persuasive depending in what it says, exactly. So you need to get your hands in a copy of this report. Call the police station and ask were they police records are kept. Then go request one if you do not have one. Make sure you understand everything on this report. Visit for this page to load an overlay sheet to decipher the police codes once you have it. 2- The recorded statement of the person in front of you. That driver statement will perhaps be the most important piece of evidence (absent other independent witnesses). The key question will be: How many impacts did you feel? If the driver in front only felt one impact, then this would be evidence that the vehicle behind was pushed into him. But if that driver felt two impacts then it was one when the car directly behind hit them, and the second when the third vehicle hit the second car. We do not know what evidence the insurance companies have. We are not sure you do either. So, put them on notice (write a certified) letter asking them to detail why you are 50% at fault. They should have done this by now. The second issue is Texas Modified Comparative Fault Statute. In Texas, if you are 50% - 50% at fault, then each party recovers against each other for 50%. If one party is 51% or more, then that party is completely barred of recovery (injuries and the damages to the car). In your situation, there is recovery if the insurance company is saying 50% -50%. If that is the case, they will go after you to pay 50% of the damages of the vehicle in front of you (if there were any). You insurance company will have to defend you under your liability coverage. When there is a dispute like this one, insurance companies will go to arbitration and let a neutral adjuster decide. If the adjuster decides 50% - 50% then insurance companies issue payments according to that decision. If they decided 100%, then the responsible party must pay for the damages. Call your own insurance company and find out why you are not in arbitration. If your insurance company does not answer, then report them to theTexas Department of Insurance Make the insurance companies put their final decision in writing. You will have more power to protect your rights.
Casey & Hector.
|
Call a Personal | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Home| Free Newsletter |Best Carriers | Insurance News| About Agents | Accident Videos | Accident Photos | Site Search | Claim Blog | Insurance Quotes | Claim vs Rate | Find a Laywer | Site Policies | Your Host |Contact us | Sitemap | |
|||||||||