Ask an Attorney a Question for FREE!
Driving after revocation | Negligence
A person driving vehicle A drifts over the center line and hits an oncoming vehicle B and driver A dies. The driver of vehicle B is injured but is driving under revocation. Who is at fault.
The driver driving under revocation or the driver who went over the center line. I would have surmised that driver B since he is committing a crime and is negligent for driving on the road. Also falsifying to his insurance company.
Does the crime committed by driver B show malice and negligence by cause
Answer to Driving after revocation
What do you mean who is at fault? If vehicle A drifts into an incoming lane causing the accident, it is pretty clear that A is at fault.
The revocation has nothing to do with the accident. That breach is not casually related to the collision. Drifting on the middle of the road is.
Driving without insurance may or may not be a crime. It may only be civil liability. In either situation, the claim fails on causation, please see: http://www.auto-insurance-claim-advice.com/Causation.html
Please all see all elements of fault here.
Click here to post comments
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Got Questions?.
Please see more answers to recent personal injury and auto accident questions below:
For a Free Review of Your Case